Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance
Date
Msg-id dcc563d10711120931s641b0dfew85b1cba175694535@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance  (Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>)
Responses Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance  (Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>)
Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance  (Steve Wampler <swampler@noao.edu>)
List pgsql-general
On Nov 12, 2007 11:29 AM, Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 10:14:46AM -0700, Steve Wampler wrote:
> > Also, what kernel are you using with CentOS 5 - a 32-bit (with hugemem
> > to support the 8GB) or a 64-bit?  And which was PostgreSQL compiled for?
>
> You don't need a 32bit kernel to support 8GB of memory should you? As
> long as the kernel supports PAE that should be enough to make use of it.
> You only need a 64bit address space when each process wants to see more
> than ~3GB of RAM.

There's a performance hit for using PAE.  Not sure what it is, but I
recall it being the in the 5 to 10% range.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Sam Mason
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance
Next
From: Sam Mason
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance