On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Frankly, there's going to be zero interest in any proposal to make this
> more flexible, because making it more flexible means opening a
> truck-sized security hole. We don't *want* Postgres loading code from
> random places.
Hmm.. that makes sense. Unfortunately that leaves me with almost no
options but to request the admin to install the packages globally.
Thanks for clearing the issues.
--
Regards
PK
--------------------------------------
http://counter.li.org #402424