Re: Performance evaluation of PostgreSQL's historic releases - Mailing list pgsql-general

From György Vilmos
Subject Re: Performance evaluation of PostgreSQL's historic releases
Date
Msg-id dac6660e0909301121v4f48a0a2tfe99d8d563c5f785@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance evaluation of PostgreSQL's historic releases  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general


2009/9/30 Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> wrote:
> P.S. On your write-heavy tests, increasing checkpoint_segments a lot should
> improve overall performance, if you re-test at some point.

Just wanted to add that in order to really test a db, you need a
benchmark that runs a lot longer than a few minutes.  I routinely use
tests that run for hours to get an idea how things like write ahead
logging and such affect the db under heavy, long term load.

Agreed, but even with 5x1 minutes of test runs for each threads it took a week to do all the tests.

I've once heard that a company have spent three man years for performance testing one of its products...

--
http://suckit.blog.hu/

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: György Vilmos
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance evaluation of PostgreSQL's historic releases
Next
From: Ricky Tompu Breaky
Date:
Subject: Re: I can not drop a user/role because an object depent on it.