Re: Custom C function - is palloc broken? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Nathan Thatcher
Subject Re: Custom C function - is palloc broken?
Date
Msg-id d9c17fb40805042053o17db19f2uba330e386afb4df4@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Custom C function - is palloc broken?  (Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>)
Responses Re: Custom C function - is palloc broken?  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Re: Custom C function - is palloc broken?  (Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>)
List pgsql-general
So what options does that leave all of us who need to compile and run
our custom C functions in Windows?

On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Craig Ringer
<craig@postnewspapers.com.au> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>
> > Dan "Heron" Myers wrote:
> >
>
>
> >
> > > I read somewhere on Postgres' website that the win32 binaries were
> > > built with MinGW - and in fact they must be, since MSVC++ does not
> > > have some of the unix headers needed to build Postgres.
> > >
> >
> > No, as of 8.3 they are build with MSVC.
> >
>
>  In case it's of any help, I was able to build the test with VC++ 8 and
> confirmed that it does still crash at the palloc() call even when the exact
> same runtime is used by both the test DLL and by postgres.exe (according to
> depends.exe).
>
>  Anyway, the birds are chirping and I have to work way too soon...
>
>  --
>  Craig Ringer
>
>
>
>  --
>  Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
>  To make changes to your subscription:
>  http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Race condition with notifications
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Custom C function - is palloc broken?