Re: [HACKERS] Testlib.pm vs msys - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Testlib.pm vs msys
Date
Msg-id d9c1448a-f96d-7bff-5723-ac906166b0f7@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Testlib.pm vs msys  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Testlib.pm vs msys
List pgsql-hackers

On 07/25/2017 01:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On 07/25/2017 11:25 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Oh.  So when was the last time it worked?  And why do the buildfarm
>>> archives contain apparently-successful log_stage entries for pg_ctl-check
>>> on jacana, up through yesterday when I looked?
>> There was a buildfarm bug, since corrected, which was not properly
>> picking up errors in a corner case. You will see the errors if you look
>> at all the logs for pg_ctl-check from 12 days back if they exist. The
>> last known actual good run of this test was 33 days ago, i.e. 2017-06-22
> Hm.  This failure presumably started with commit f13ea95f9, which
> introduced use of command_like() in the pg_ctl TAP test; but that
> didn't go in until 2017-06-28.  Was jacana not running in the
> interim?


Looks like not, possibly because one of the other machines on this box
was hung (probably lorikeet).


>
> Anyway, if we believe that it broke with f13ea95f9, hen it's plausible
> that CMD.EXE has been sharing pg_ctl's stdout/stderr all along, and we
> just had not noticed before.  Could you check what happens if we
> change the bInheritHandles parameter as I suggested upthread?
>
>             


I'll try when I get all the animals caught up.

cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Inadequate infrastructure for NextValueExpr
Next
From: Arseny Sher
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] expand_dbname in postgres_fdw