On Tue, 2021-11-16 at 15:24 +0530, Sanjay Minni wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 at 14:50, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-11-16 at 13:56 +0530, Sanjay Minni wrote:
> > > I need to keep a copy of old data as the rows are changed.
> > >
> > > For a general RDBMS I could think of keeping all the data in the same table with a flag
> > > to indicate older copies of updated / deleted rows or keep a parallel table and copy
> > > these rows into the parallel data under program / trigger control. Each has its pros and cons.
> > >
> > > In Postgres would i have to follow the same methods or are there any features / packages available ?
> >
> > Yes, I would use one of these methods.
> >
> > The only feature I can think of that may help is partitioning: if you have one partition
> > for the current data and one for the deleted data, then updating the flag would
> > automatically move the row between partitions, so you don't need a trigger.
>
> Are you referring to Table Partitioning ?
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/ddl-partitioning.html
Yes, exactly.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
