Re: Commitfest 2023-09 starts soon - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Commitfest 2023-09 starts soon
Date
Msg-id d907f58f-1466-e953-f8b2-f73c9a0ef5ee@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Commitfest 2023-09 starts soon  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
Responses Re: Commitfest 2023-09 starts soon
List pgsql-hackers
I have done several passes to make sure that patch statuses are more 
accurate.  As explained in a nearby message, I have set several patches 
back from "Ready to Committer" to "Needs review" if additional 
discussion happened past the first status change.  I have also in 
several cases removed reviewers from a patch entry if they haven't been 
active on the thread in several months.  (Feel free to sign up again, 
but don't "block" the patch.)

I was going to say, unfortunately that means that there is now even more 
work to do, but in fact, it seems this has all kind of balanced out, and 
I hope it's now more accurate for someone wanting to pick up some work:

Status summary: Needs review: 224. Waiting on Author: 24. Ready for 
Committer: 31. Committed: 41. Returned with Feedback: 14. Withdrawn: 2. 
Rejected: 2. Total: 338.

(And yes, the total number of patches has grown since the commitfest has 
started!?!)


On 01.09.23 14:55, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Okay, here we go, starting with:
> 
> Status summary: Needs review: 227. Waiting on Author: 37. Ready for 
> Committer: 30. Committed: 40. Rejected: 1. Returned with Feedback: 1. 
> Withdrawn: 1. Total: 337.
> 
> (which is less than CF 2023-07)
> 
> I have also already applied one round of the waiting-on-author-pruning 
> described below (not included in the above figures).
> 
> 
> On 31.08.23 10:36, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Commitfest 2023-09 (https://commitfest.postgresql.org/44/) starts in 
>> less than 28 hours.
>>
>> If you have any patches you would like considered, be sure to add them 
>> in good time.
>>
>> All patch authors, and especially experienced hackers, are requested 
>> to make sure the patch status is up to date.  If the patch is still 
>> being worked on, it might not need to be in "Needs review".  
>> Conversely, if you are hoping for a review but the status is "Waiting 
>> on author", then it will likely be ignored by reviewers.
>>
>> There are a number of patches carried over from the PG16 development 
>> cycle that have been in "Waiting on author" for several months.  I 
>> will aggressively prune those after the start of this commitfest if 
>> there hasn't been any author activity by then.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ranier Vilela
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoid a possible null pointer (src/backend/utils/adt/pg_locale.c)
Next
From: Andy Fan
Date:
Subject: Re: Extract numeric filed in JSONB more effectively