Re: [GENERAL] different results for large objects - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From c k
Subject Re: [GENERAL] different results for large objects
Date
Msg-id d8e7a1e30903170627o35bae6bbrc43d5bb4865c2d45@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] different results for large objects  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-admin
Yes, the problem is with PGAdmin and ODBC connection to MS access.
The function (given is first mail) is giving same results i.e. only IDs not the actual data from PGAdmin and ODBC.
But for following query PGAdmin gives again only IDs, but MS Access through ODBC gives the actual binary data.

select docimages.* from docimages where docimages.accobjecttype=9 ORDER BY docimages.docimagename;

So I think ODBc is making some magic here for showing large object data. If this is correct how can I retrieve the actual binary data from a function/single statement as above?

Thanks,
CPK


On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
c k <shreeseva.learning@gmail.com> writes:
> I am getting correct results with following query i.e. binary objects as
> they are inserted.

> select docimages.* from docimages where docimages.accobjecttype=9 ORDER BY
> docimages.docimagename;

> but when I created a function as follows, binary objects are not shown,

There is no server-side behavior that would cause that query to show you
a large object's contents instead of its identifying number.  I suppose
that you have some client-side code that does something magic when it
sees a result column of type "lo", and that for some reason this code
is not successfully recognizing the case where the column is coming out
of a function.  Since you've shown us neither the troublesome query
nor the client-side code, it's hard to speculate further than that.

                       regards, tom lane

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Need help to restore database
Next
From: Ray Stell
Date:
Subject: Re: Need help to restore database