Re: [v15 beta] pg_upgrade failed if earlier executed with -c switch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [v15 beta] pg_upgrade failed if earlier executed with -c switch
Date
Msg-id d7467188-2895-d92a-1eb2-32e43b93d51c@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [v15 beta] pg_upgrade failed if earlier executed with -c switch  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2022-06-13 Mo 22:50, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 05:45:11PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> The module is already a noop if there's a TAP test for pg_upgrade. So I
>> don't understand the point of the PR at all.
> Oh.  I thought that the old path was still taken as long as
> --enable-tap-tests was not used.  I was wrong, then.  I'll go and
> remove the pull request.


It did that from 2018 (826d450), but from 2021(691e649) all it does is
look for the TAP test subdirectory. The old logic is still there
redundantly, so I'll remove it to clean up confusion.


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: better page-level checksums