Re: Vacuum statistics - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alena Rybakina
Subject Re: Vacuum statistics
Date
Msg-id d711fa74-18c5-4e6b-94e9-714892aea01a@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Vacuum statistics  (Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 22.08.2024 05:47, jian he wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 6:37 AM Alena Rybakina
<a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
We check it there: "tabentry->vacuum_ext.type != type". Or were you talking about something else?

On 19.08.2024 12:32, jian he wrote:

in pg_stats_vacuum    if (type == PGSTAT_EXTVAC_INDEX || type == PGSTAT_EXTVAC_HEAP)    {        Oid                    relid = PG_GETARG_OID(1);
        /* Load table statistics for specified database. */        if (OidIsValid(relid))        {            tabentry = fetch_dbstat_tabentry(dbid, relid);            if (tabentry == NULL || tabentry->vacuum_ext.type != type)                /* Table don't exists or isn't an heap relation. */                PG_RETURN_NULL();
            tuplestore_put_for_relation(relid, rsinfo, tabentry);        }        else        {       }


So for functions pg_stat_vacuum_indexes and pg_stat_vacuum_tables,
it seems you didn't check "relid" 's relkind,
you may need to use get_rel_relkind.

--
hi.
I mentioned some points at [1],
Please check the attached patchset to address these issues.

Thank you for your work! I checked the patches and added your suggested changes to the new version of the patch here [0]. In my opinion, nothing was missing, but please take a look.

[0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/c4e4e305-7119-4183-b49a-d7092f4efba3%40postgrespro.ru


there are four occurrences of "CurrentDatabaseId", i am still confused
with usage of CurrentDatabaseId.

It needed to be used because of scanning objects from the other database, so we change the id of dbid temporary to achieve it.

You should snow that every part of this code was deleted. Now we can check information about tables and indexes from the current database.

also please don't  top-post, otherwise the archive, like [2] is not
easier to read for future readers.
generally you quote first, then reply.

[1] https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxHb_YGCp=pVH6DZcpk9yML+SueffPeaRbX2LzXZVahd_w@mail.gmail.com
[2] https://postgr.es/m/78394e29-a900-4af4-b5ce-d6eb2d263fad@postgrespro.ru
Ok, no problem.
-- 
Regards,
Alena Rybakina
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-trivial condition is only propagated to one side of JOIN
Next
From: Alena Rybakina
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum statistics