Re: Unified logging system for command-line programs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Unified logging system for command-line programs
Date
Msg-id d6e0e58c-e103-c287-b410-2c872067e020@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unified logging system for command-line programs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Unified logging system for command-line programs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 03/01/2019 22:01, Tom Lane wrote:
> I envisioned that we'd have a wrapper in which
> non-error ereports() map directly onto what you're calling
> pg_log_debug, pg_log_warning, etc,

My code does that, but the other way around.  (It's easier that way than
to unpack ereport() invocations.)

> while ereport(ERROR) has the
> effect of writing a message and then calling exit(1).

The problem is that in majority of cases the FRONTEND code, as it is
written today, doesn't want to exit() after an error.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH][PROPOSAL] Add enum releation option type
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0