On 2017/08/02 20:40, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 3:46 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> If the user has specified "not valid" for a constraint on the foreign
>> table, there is high chance that s/he is aware of the fact that the
>> remote table that the foreign table points to has some rows which will
>> violet the constraint. So, +1.
>
> +1 from me, too.
Alright, thanks.
Attached is a patch. I think this could be considered a bug-fix,
backpatchable to 9.6 which introduced this behavior change [1].
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Amit
[1]
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=f27a6b15e656
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
