On 03/28/2018 05:12 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Tomas Vondra
> <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com <mailto:tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>> wrote:
>
> On 03/28/2018 03:28 PM, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> >> BTW, patch had conflicts with master. Please, find rebased version
> >> attached.
> >
> > Despite by patch conflist patch looks commitable, has anybody objections
> > to commit it?
> >
> > Patch recieved several rounds of review during 2 years, and seems to me,
> > keeping it out from sources may cause a lost it. Although it suggests
> > performance improvement in rather wide usecases.
> >
>
> No objections from me - if you want me to do one final round of review
> after the rebase (not sure how invasive it'll turn out), let me know.
>
>
> Rebased patch is attached. Incremental sort get used in multiple places
> of partition_aggregate regression test. I've checked those cases, and
> it seems that incremental sort was selected right.
>
OK, I'll take a look.
> BTW one detail I'd change is name of the GUC variable. enable_incsort
> seems unnecessarily terse - let's go for enable_incremental_sort or
> something like that.
>
>
> Already enable_incsort was already renamed to enable_incrementalsort
> since [1].
>
> 1.
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAPpHfduAVmiGDZC%2BdfNL1rEGu0mt45Rd_mxwjY57uqwWhrvQzg%40mail.gmail.com
>
Ah, apologies. I've been looking at the wrong version.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
