Re: AIX support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: AIX support
Date
Msg-id d2c57c97-cb4d-4fd7-83d0-5f92b2aa03ca@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: AIX support  (Srirama Kucherlapati <sriram.rk@in.ibm.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 19/06/2024 17:55, Srirama Kucherlapati wrote:
> +/* Commenting for XLC
> + * "IBM XL C/C++ for AIX, V12.1" miscompiles, for 32-bit, some inline
> + * expansions of ginCompareItemPointers() "long long" arithmetic.  To take
> + * advantage of inlining, build a 64-bit PostgreSQL.
> +#if defined(__ILP32__) && defined(__IBMC__)
> +#define PG_FORCE_DISABLE_INLINE
> +#endif
> + */

This seems irrelevant.

> + * Ordinarily, we'd code the branches here using GNU-style local symbols, that
> + * is "1f" referencing "1:" and so on.  But some people run gcc on AIX with
> + * IBM's assembler as backend, and IBM's assembler doesn't do local symbols.
> + * So hand-code the branch offsets; fortunately, all PPC instructions are
> + * exactly 4 bytes each, so it's not too hard to count.

Could you use GCC assembler to avoid this?

> @@ -662,6 +666,21 @@ tas(volatile slock_t *lock)
>  
>  #if !defined(HAS_TEST_AND_SET)    /* We didn't trigger above, let's try here */
>  
> +#if defined(_AIX)    /* AIX */
> +/*
> + * AIX (POWER)
> + */
> +#define HAS_TEST_AND_SET
> +
> +#include <sys/atomic_op.h>
> +
> +typedef int slock_t;
> +
> +#define TAS(lock)            _check_lock((slock_t *) (lock), 0, 1)
> +#define S_UNLOCK(lock)        _clear_lock((slock_t *) (lock), 0)
> +#endif     /* _AIX */
> +
> +
>  /* These are in sunstudio_(sparc|x86).s */
>  
>  #if defined(__SUNPRO_C) && (defined(__i386) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__sparc__) || defined(__sparc))

What CPI/compiler/OS configuration is this for, exactly? Could we rely 
on GCC-provided __sync_lock_test_and_set() builtin function instead?

> +# Allow platforms with buggy compilers to force restrict to not be
> +# used by setting $FORCE_DISABLE_RESTRICT=yes in the relevant
> +# template.

Surely we don't need that anymore? Or is the compiler still buggy?

Do you still care about 32-bit binaries on AIX? If not, let's make that 
the default in configure or a check for it, and remove the instructions 
on building 32-bit binaries from the docs.

Please try hard to remove any changes from the diff that are not 
absolutely necessary.

- Heikki




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: suspicious valgrind reports about radixtree/tidstore on arm64
Next
From: Jelte Fennema-Nio
Date:
Subject: Re: Extension security improvement: Add support for extensions with an owned schema