hm, a few days and not a single reply :|
any more information needed? test data? simplified test case? anything?
thanks
Hannes Dorbath wrote:
> The query and the corresponding EXPLAIN is at
>
> http://hannes.imos.net/query.txt
>
> I'd like to use the column q.replaced_serials for multiple calculations
> in the SELECT clause, but every time it is referenced there in some way
> the whole query in the FROM clause returning q is executed again.
>
> This doesn't make sense to me at all and eats performance.
>
> If this wasn't clear enough, for every
>
> q.replaced_serials <insert_random_calculation> AS some_column
>
> in the SELECT clause there is new block of
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> -> Aggregate (cost=884.23..884.23 rows=1 width=0)
> -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..884.23 rows=1 width=0)
> -> Index Scan using ix_rma_ticket_serials_replace on
> rma_ticket_serials rts (cost=0.00..122.35
> rows=190 width=4)
> Index Cond: ("replace" = false)
> -> Index Scan using pk_serials on serials s
> (cost=0.00..3.51 rows=1 width=4)
> Index Cond: (s.serial_id = "outer".serial_id)
> Filter: ((article_no = $0) AND (delivery_id = $1))
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> in the EXPLAIN result.
>
> For those who wonder why I do this FROM (SELECT...). I was searching for
> a way to use the result of an subselect for multiple calculations in the
> SELECT clause and return that calculation results as individual columns.
>
> I tested a bit further and found out that PG behaves the same in case q
> is a view. This makes me wonder how efficient the optimizer can work
> with views - or even worse - nested views.
>
> Tested and reproduced on PG 7.4.1 linux and 8.0.0 win32.
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Hannes Dorbath
--
imos Gesellschaft fuer Internet-Marketing und Online-Services mbH
Alfons-Feifel-Str. 9 // D-73037 Goeppingen // Stauferpark Ost
Tel: 07161 93339-14 // Fax: 07161 93339-99 // Internet: www.imos.net
