Re: Would PostgreSQL 16 native transparent data encryption support database level encryption? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Thorsten Glaser
Subject Re: Would PostgreSQL 16 native transparent data encryption support database level encryption?
Date
Msg-id d22f21d-e256-15aa-9d79-68522af2edd0@evolvis.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Would PostgreSQL 16 native transparent data encryption support database level encryption?  (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Would PostgreSQL 16 native transparent data encryption support database level encryption?  (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, 18 May 2023, Ron wrote:

>> Why not using multiple clusters then?
>
> Yet More Firewall Rules to get approved by the Security Team.  And then they
> balk at port 5433 because they've never heard of it.

But mixing multiple customers on one cluster is much more of a risk.

> And from a technical point of view, one Postgresql system can better manage the
> memory on a VM than two which don't know about each other.

Probably true. Is there something with which multiple clusters running
on the same server can communicate to do that better?

bye,
//mirabilos
--
15:41⎜<Lo-lan-do:#fusionforge> Somebody write a testsuite for helloworld :-)



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ron
Date:
Subject: Re: Would PostgreSQL 16 native transparent data encryption support database level encryption?
Next
From: eacil
Date:
Subject: Modeling combinations (options and dependencies)