On 2023-12-20 We 11:05, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 2023-12-19 Tu 08:57, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> The posted v5 seems like a good compromise
>> I reckon.
>>
>> Andrew: When applying this, how do we synchronize with the buildfarm
>> to avoid
>> false negatives due to the BF using the wrong options?
>
>
> The only buildfarm animal involved here is koel, which I run, so the
> simplest way will be for me to commit the core patch and adjust the
> buildfarm code at the same time.
>
>
V5 seems to be the consensus. I went with that, but added in logic to
exit the loop early for --check if we're not also doing --diff.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com