Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?
Date
Msg-id d0d90bc1-41c7-619d-19b3-4bcfd817155c@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 4/5/17 09:58, Robert Haas wrote:
>> - Maybe add a check to opr_sanity to make sure the default set of
>> functions is configured the way we want?
> That seems like a good idea.

patch

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Add and report the new "in_hot_standby" GUC pseudo-variable.