Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob_RwL=H6iimtF8LtSC4C=L2=PxCDxTd1ONiFKtKp+ihw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 4/5/17 09:58, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> - Maybe add a check to opr_sanity to make sure the default set of
>>> functions is configured the way we want?
>> That seems like a good idea.
>
> patch

LGTM

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?