Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?
Date
Msg-id 20625.1491409774@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 4/5/17 09:58, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> - Maybe add a check to opr_sanity to make sure the default set of
>>> functions is configured the way we want?

>> That seems like a good idea.

> patch

Looks sane to me, although I wonder if opr_sanity ought to be looking
for any other combinations.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Functions Immutable but not parallel safe?
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Implementation of SASLprep for SCRAM-SHA-256