Re: Adding CI to our tree - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Adding CI to our tree
Date
Msg-id d0862e1b-b2db-572f-4ed4-0d245ff8ef1e@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Adding CI to our tree  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/18/22 12:44, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-01-18 11:20:08 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> Sure, very doable, although we will still need some special logic for
>> src/test - there are security implication from running the ssl, ldap and
>> kerberos tests by default. See its Makefile.
> ISTM that we should move the PG_TEST_EXTRA handling into the tests. Then we'd
> not need to duplicate them in the make / msvc world and we'd see them as
> skipped tests when not enabled.
>

Yeah, good idea. Especially if we can backpatch that. The buildfarm
client would also get simpler, so it would be doubleplusgood.


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: James Coleman
Date:
Subject: Re: Add last commit LSN to pg_last_committed_xact()
Next
From: Alexander Pyhalov
Date:
Subject: Re: Push down time-related SQLValue functions to foreign server