Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was: comp.databases.postgresql.*) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joeseph P. Blow
Subject Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was: comp.databases.postgresql.*)
Date
Msg-id cp0ebs$4gj$2@herekittykitty.databasix.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was: comp.databases.postgresql.*)  (Woodchuck Bill <bwr607@hotmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 01:24:46 +0000 (GMT), bhk@dsl.co.uk (Brian
{Hamilton Kelly}) wrote:

>On Saturday, in article
>     <tto3r01vijeu2n9ggr6r5pl3p36bcmn1nf@4ax.com>
>     robert.mcclenon@verizon.net "Robert McClenon" wrote:
>
>> I think that the term that is occasionally used is that the hierarchy
>> has a hierarchy czar.  That is the most straightforward way to manage
>> a hierarchy.  I did not say that it was the best or the worst, only
>> the most straightforward.  It doesn't address the question of what
>> happens if the czar disappears, for instance.
>
>Seventy-five years' rule by Soviet?

Russia takes over Usenet. Film at eleven.

--
Just your average Joe.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bob Parnes
Date:
Subject: Network authentication
Next
From: bhk@dsl.co.uk (Brian {Hamilton Kelly})
Date:
Subject: Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was: comp.databases.postgresql.*)