Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was: comp.databases.postgresql.*) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Woodchuck Bill
Subject Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was: comp.databases.postgresql.*)
Date
Msg-id Xns95B49E671C85Ebswr607h4@130.133.1.4
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
David Harmon <source@netcom.com> wrote in
news:41c44692.42645781@news.west.earthlink.net:

> On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 00:29:40 +0000 (UTC) in news.groups, Marc G.
> Fournier From: <scrappy@hub.org> wrote,
>>The pgsql.* hierarchy is a not a private one, it is a public one
>>carried by several of the large usenet servers.
>
> What are the rules for creating new groups in pgsgl.*?
>
>

Fiat-only by Marc. ;-)

--
Bill

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Woodchuck Bill
Date:
Subject: Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql