Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was: comp.databases.postgresql.*) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From bhk@dsl.co.uk (Brian {Hamilton Kelly})
Subject Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was: comp.databases.postgresql.*)
Date
Msg-id 20041206.0124.58723snz@dsl.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was: comp.databases.postgresql.*)  (Woodchuck Bill <bwr607@hotmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Saturday, in article
     <tto3r01vijeu2n9ggr6r5pl3p36bcmn1nf@4ax.com>
     robert.mcclenon@verizon.net "Robert McClenon" wrote:

> I think that the term that is occasionally used is that the hierarchy
> has a hierarchy czar.  That is the most straightforward way to manage
> a hierarchy.  I did not say that it was the best or the worst, only
> the most straightforward.  It doesn't address the question of what
> happens if the czar disappears, for instance.

Seventy-five years' rule by Soviet?

--
Brian {Hamilton Kelly}                                     bhk@dsl.co.uk
   "I don't use Linux. I prefer to use an OS supported by a large multi-
   national vendor, with a good office suite, excellent network/internet
   software and decent hardware support."

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Joeseph P. Blow"
Date:
Subject: Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was: comp.databases.postgresql.*)
Next
From: Paul Tillotson
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance tuning on RedHat Enterprise Linux 3