pg_visibility's pg_check_visible() yields false positive when working in parallel with autovacuum - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Daniel Shelepanov
Subject pg_visibility's pg_check_visible() yields false positive when working in parallel with autovacuum
Date
Msg-id cfcca574-6967-c5ab-7dc3-2c82b6723b99@mail.ru
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: pg_visibility's pg_check_visible() yields false positive when working in parallel with autovacuum
List pgsql-bugs

Hello everyone!

I've been examining a floating bug in pg_visibility. To reproduce it, you have to:

1) apply a patch to pg_visibility's tests (you can find it attached)

2) run test-icx.sh (attached) from the root of the postgresql's source tree

pg_vis_clean.patch adds one additional test to pg_visibility test suite and normally it is expected to pass. However, when (I assume so) it happens to run in parallel with autovacuum, the test is failed. test-icx.sh runs several parallel installchecks on contrib/pg_visibility tests and there is a chance that some of them will catch this error.

This is the set-up for a bug reproduction:

create table vacuum_test as select 42 i;
vacuum (disable_page_skipping) vacuum_test;

This is the actual test result:

diff -U3 /tmp/icx/ic01-1/contrib/pg_visibility/expected/pg_visibility.out /tmp/icx/ic01-1/contrib/pg_visibility/results/pg_visibility.out
--- /tmp/icx/ic01-1/contrib/pg_visibility/expected/pg_visibility.out    2022-02-17 23:46:26.005500630 +0300
+++ /tmp/icx/ic01-1/contrib/pg_visibility/results/pg_visibility.out 2022-02-17 23:47:36.066838872 +0300
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@
 select count(*) > 0 from pg_check_visible('vacuum_test');
  ?column?
 ----------
- f
+ t
 (1 row)

 -- cleanup


The thing is that the underlying file is one page long which should contain the only all-visible tuple and pg_check_visible should return nothing. Is this a real bug or do I miss something? Thank you in advance for the response

P. S.: SELECT version(); result: PostgreSQL 14.2 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Ubuntu 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04) 9.3.0, 64-bit


Attachment

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tyler Rockwood
Date:
Subject: Optimizer picking a poor plan for Serializable Transaction Isolation
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimizer picking a poor plan for Serializable Transaction Isolation