Home > mailing lists

Bug in plpgsql, when using NEW with composite field value. - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From	Oleg Serov
Subject	Bug in plpgsql, when using NEW with composite field value.
Date	December 10, 2008 08:54:37
Msg-id	cec7c6df0812100154h21cd6117sfb98fafb8643c896@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw
Responses	Re: Bug in plpgsql, when using NEW with composite field value. Re: Bug in plpgsql, when using NEW with composite field value.
List	pgsql-bugs

Tree view
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pgsql-bugs by date:

From: Marc Schablewski
Date: 10 December 2008, 08:52:14
Subject: Re: BUG #4565: nextval not updated during wal replication, leading to pk violations

From: "Oleg Serov"
Date: 10 December 2008, 09:19:24
Subject: plpgsql bug OR future request: Assign fileds in composite subfiled. eg. table.compositefield.subfield := TRUE;

Bug in plpgsql, when using NEW with composite field value. - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

Previous

Next