Re: Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marko Tiikkaja
Subject Re: Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE
Date
Msg-id cd109b54-6c5a-b3f2-a440-c38d9be07c4d@joh.to
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/08/16 8:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to> wrote:
>> On 2016-08-11 12:09 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>>
>>> BTW this is not a regression, right?  It's been broken all along.  Or am
>>> I mistaken?
>>
>> You're probably right.  I just hadn't realized I could run our app against
>> 9.5 with --enable-cassert until last week.
>
> Just wondering... If you revert 1f9534b4 and/or b33e81cb do you still
> see a problem?

Yeah, no effect.


.m



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vladimir Sitnikov
Date:
Subject: Re: Slowness of extended protocol
Next
From: Palle Girgensohn
Date:
Subject: Re: Improved ICU patch - WAS: Implementing full UTF-8 support (aka supporting 0x00)