Re: Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqRpnr2zWhxBF8NBZCx6mEmFT=EMOO7fG8HZx-Av_U88gA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE  (Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>)
Responses Re: Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to> wrote:
> On 2016-08-11 12:09 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>
>> BTW this is not a regression, right?  It's been broken all along.  Or am
>> I mistaken?
>
>
> You're probably right.  I just hadn't realized I could run our app against
> 9.5 with --enable-cassert until last week.

Just wondering... If you revert 1f9534b4 and/or b33e81cb do you still
see a problem?
-- 
Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: new autovacuum criterion for visible pages
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: new autovacuum criterion for visible pages