Re: Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE
Date
Msg-id 20160816162746.d4grlsdfihs6nxmg@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE  (Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>)
Responses Re: Assertion failure in REL9_5_STABLE  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2016-08-11 11:01:18 +0200, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
> On 11/08/16 8:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to> wrote:
> > > On 2016-08-11 12:09 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > BTW this is not a regression, right?  It's been broken all along.  Or am
> > > > I mistaken?
> > > 
> > > You're probably right.  I just hadn't realized I could run our app against
> > > 9.5 with --enable-cassert until last week.
> > 
> > Just wondering... If you revert 1f9534b4 and/or b33e81cb do you still
> > see a problem?
> 
> Yeah, no effect.

Phew. Alvaro, are you tackling this?



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Yury Zhuravlev
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres