On Thu, 2024-05-30 at 08:21 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> No objections to using export over backup, but it does make the use of
> "restore" feel awkward as that's generally an operation on a backup and not an
> export.
>
> - least one schema/table in the backup file.
> + least one schema/table in the file to be restored.
>
> Would it make sense to use "import" in some cases instead?
What about calling it "dump file" instead of "file to be restored"?
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
