Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
Date
Msg-id cc94506c-f34c-4081-09f9-d1d1837a1524@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take  (amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017/02/09 15:22, amul sul wrote:
> About 0001-Check-partition-strategy-in-ATExecDropNotNull.patch,
> following test is already covered in alter_table.sql @ Line # 1918,
> instead of this kindly add test for list_partition:
> 
>  77 +-- cannot drop NOT NULL constraint of a range partition key column
>  78 +ALTER TABLE range_parted ALTER a DROP NOT NULL;
>  79 +

Thanks for the review!  You're right.  Updated patch attached.

Thanks,
Amit

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Removal of deprecated views pg_user, pg_group, pg_shadow
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Removal of deprecated views pg_user, pg_group,pg_shadow