Re: SQL/JSON features for v15 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Subject | Re: SQL/JSON features for v15 |
Date | |
Msg-id | cc17d718-56a1-359f-2792-01c5debd67e3@dunslane.net Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: SQL/JSON features for v15 (Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru>) |
Responses |
Re: SQL/JSON features for v15
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-08-23 Tu 17:29, Nikita Glukhov wrote: > > > On 23.08.2022 22:31, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: >> On 8/23/22 2:10 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >>> >>> On 2022-08-23 Tu 13:24, Tom Lane wrote: >>>> "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org> writes: >>>>> I saw Andrew suggest that the controversial parts of the patchset >>>>> may be >>>>> severable from some of the new functionality, so I would like to see >>>>> that proposal and if it is enough to overcome concerns. >>>> It's an interesting suggestion. Do people have the cycles available >>>> to make it happen in the next few days? >>>> >>> I will make time although probably Nikita and/or Amit would be quicker >>> than I would be. >> >> If you all can, you have my +1 to try it and see what folks think. > I am ready to start hacking now, but it's already night in Moscow, so > any result will be only tomorrow. > > Here is my plan: > > 0. Take my last v7-0001 patch as a base. It already contains refactoring > of JsonCoercion code. (Fix 0002 is not needed anymore, because it is for > json[b] domains, which simply will not be supported.) > > 1. Replace JSON_COERCION_VIA_EXPR in JsonCoercion with new > JsonCoercionType(s) for hardcoded coercions. > > 2. Disable all non-JSON-compatible output types in coerceJsonFuncExpr(). > > 3. Add missing safe type input functions for integers, numerics, and > maybe others. > > 4. Implement hardcoded coercions using these functions in > ExecEvalJsonExprCoercion(). > > 5. Try to allow only constants (and also maybe column/parameter > references) in JSON_VALUE's DEFAULT expressions. This should be enough > for the most of practical cases. JSON_QUERY even does not have DEFAULT > expressions -- it has only EMPTY ARRAY and EMPTY OBJECT, which can be > treated as simple JSON constants. er, really? This is from the regression output: SELECT JSON_QUERY(jsonb '[]', '$[*]' DEFAULT '"empty"' ON EMPTY); json_query ------------ "empty" (1 row) SELECT JSON_QUERY(jsonb '[1,2]', '$[*]' DEFAULT '"empty"' ON ERROR); json_query ------------ "empty" (1 row) > > But it is possible to allow all other expressions in ERROR ON ERROR > case, and I don't know if it will be consistent enough to allow some > expressions in one case and deny in other. > > And there is another problem: expressions can be only checked for > Const-ness only after expression simplification. AFAIU, at the > parsing stage they look like 'string'::type. So, it's unclear if it > is correct to check expressions in ExecInitExpr(). > > 6. Remove subtransactions. > Sounds like a good plan, modulo the issues in item 5. I would rather lose some features temporarily than try to turn handsprings to make them work and jeopardize the rest. I'll look forward to seeing your patch in the morning :-) cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
pgsql-hackers by date: