Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: bailing out in tap tests nearly always a bad idea - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: bailing out in tap tests nearly always a bad idea
Date
Msg-id cb9b50bb-c3aa-94f2-5407-fd860f94d947@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bailing out in tap tests nearly always a bad idea  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: bailing out in tap tests nearly always a bad idea
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 2/22/22 15:54, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2022-02-22 15:10:30 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> I'll be surprised if we can't come up with something cleaner than that.
> Suggestions?


If we just have the sig handler actions as:

    diag("died: $_[0]");
    done_testing();   

we get:

    ok 1 - foo
    # died: blorb at tst/tst.pl line 5.
    1..1
    # Looks like your test exited with 25 just after 1.


Would that work?


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nitin Jadhav
Date:
Subject: Re: Report checkpoint progress with pg_stat_progress_checkpoint (was: Report checkpoint progress in server logs)
Next
From: Nitin Jadhav
Date:
Subject: Re: Report checkpoint progress with pg_stat_progress_checkpoint (was: Report checkpoint progress in server logs)