Re: slow pg_dump with bytea - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: slow pg_dump with bytea
Date
Msg-id cb80c6f3c21a798d29f7db46c78e650bbcd95705.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to slow pg_dump with bytea  (Janning Vygen <vygen@kicktipp.de>)
Responses Re: slow pg_dump with bytea
List pgsql-bugs
On Fri, 2023-10-20 at 12:26 +0200, Janning Vygen wrote:
> I don't know if the PG developers are aware of this:
>
> https://serverfault.com/questions/1081642/postgresql-13-speed-up-pg-dump-to-5-minutes-instead-of-70-minutes
>
> But this question is quite famous and many users like the solution.
> So maybe you can fix it by changing the pg_dump process to not compress
> any bytea data.

Doesn't sound like a bug to me.

Compression is determined when "pg_dump" starts.  How should it guess that
there is a binary column with compressed data in some table?  Even if it did,
I wouldn't feel well with a "pg_dump" with enough artificial intelligence to
do this automatically for me (and get it wrong occasionally).

In addition, I don't think that this problem is limited to compressed
binary data.  In my experience, compressed dumps are always slower than
uncompressed ones.  It is a speed vs. size thing.

By the way, PostgreSQL v16 introduced compression with "lz4" und "zstd"
to "pg_dump", which is much faster.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Lakhin
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18014: Releasing catcache entries makes schema_to_xmlschema() fail when parallel workers are used
Next
From: Janning Vygen
Date:
Subject: Re: slow pg_dump with bytea