On 9/7/16 2:02 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>>> >> Exactly. You can pass anonymous record types around today, as long as you
>>> >> don't do anything that requires knowing what their contents are, either in
>>> >> the function or in the calling query:
>> >
>> > What I was thinking of is something (like a function) that has explicitly
>> > defined what the contents of the record are.
> We have that already, it's named 'json_each_text'
Apparently you haven't looked at json parse/deparse costs ;P
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461
