Re: replication_slots usability issue - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On 01/11/2018 18:54, Andres Freund wrote:>
>> Also, from 691d79a which you just committed:
>> +       ereport(FATAL,
>> +               (errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
>> +                errmsg("logical replication slots \"%s\" exists, but wal_level < logical",
>> +                       NameStr(cp.slotdata.name)),
>> I can see one grammar mistake here, as you refer to only one slot here.
>> The error messages should read:
>> "logical replication slot \"%s\" exists, but wal_level < logical"
>> and:
>> "physical replication slot \"%s\" exists, but wal_level < replica"
> 
> Darnit. Fixed. Thanks.
> 

Since we are fixing this message, shouldn't the hint for logical slot
say "Change wal_level to be logical or higher" rather than "replica or
higher" :)

-- 
  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
  PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services