Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage
Date
Msg-id c71a3d6a-4196-19d8-b890-533f2cb6ee07@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017/11/03 6:24, Tom Lane wrote:
> Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
>> On 2017/09/26 16:30, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> Cool, let's switch it back to a ready for committer status then.
> 
>> Sure, thanks.
> 
> Pushed with some cosmetic adjustments --- mostly, making the comments more
> explicit about why we need the apparently-redundant assignments to
> pd_lower.

Thank you.

Regards,
Amit



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations