Re: msys inet_pton strangeness - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: msys inet_pton strangeness
Date
Msg-id c654d3ae-6a03-4281-8935-593d9825d4fb@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: msys inet_pton strangeness  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: msys inet_pton strangeness
List pgsql-hackers
On 2024-09-30 Mo 10:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> Ah, so this is because gcc 14.1.0 treats this as an error but gcc 12.2.0
>> treats it as a warning. Now it makes sense.
> Not entirely ... if fairywren had been generating that warning all
> along, I would have noticed it long ago, because I periodically
> scrape the BF database for compiler warnings.  There has to have
> been some recent change in the system include files.


here's what I see on vendikar:


pgbfprod=> select min(snapshot) from build_status_log where log_stage in 
('build.log', 'make.log') and branch = 'REL_15_STABLE' and sysname = 
'fairywren' and snapshot > now() - interval '1500 days' and log_text ~ 
'inet_pton';
          min
---------------------
  2022-06-30 18:04:08
(1 row)


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade check for invalid databases
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Do not lock temp relations