Re: Restrict publishing of partitioned table with a foreign table as partition - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Sergey Tatarintsev
Subject Re: Restrict publishing of partitioned table with a foreign table as partition
Date
Msg-id c64352fa-9a30-4e0a-853a-a6b5b6d07f4e@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Restrict publishing of partitioned table with a foreign table as partition  (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: Restrict publishing of partitioned table with a foreign table as partition
List pgsql-hackers
07.04.2025 03:27, Álvaro Herrera пишет:
On 2025-Apr-01, Shlok Kyal wrote:

I have modified the comment in create_publication.sgml and also added
comment in the restrictions section of logical-replication.sgml.
I have also added a more detailed explanation in comment of
'check_foreign_tables'

I have attached the updated v11 patch.
Sadly I don't have time to describe the changes proposed here right now,
but I'll do that early tomorrow.  (Some minor changes are still needed,
particularly the comments to publication_check_foreign_parts which are
mostly unchanged from what your patch has.  I'll do another review round
tomorrow.)

Hello!

I looked at the latest patch again and found one more place for list_free(). Also look at additional test case:

diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/pg_publication.c b/src/backend/catalog/pg_publication.c index 51e463c112b..7fcc191feb9 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/pg_publication.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/pg_publication.c @@ -442,6 +442,7 @@ GetPubPartitionOptionRelations(List *result, PublicationPartOpt pub_partopt,                           result = lappend_oid(result, partOid);                 } +               list_free(all_parts);         }         else                 result = lappend_oid(result, relid); diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/publication.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/publication.sql index 49c9d98b668..e56aebc397a 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/publication.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/publication.sql @@ -1296,6 +1296,14 @@ SELECT pubname, tablename FROM pg_publication_tables WHERE schemaname in ('sch3'  -- foreign partition  ALTER PUBLICATION pub1 SET (publish_via_partition_root);   +CREATE SCHEMA sch5; +CREATE SCHEMA sch6; +CREATE TABLE sch6.tmain(id int) PARTITION BY RANGE(id); +CREATE TABLE sch5.part1 PARTITION OF sch6.tmain FOR VALUES FROM (0) TO (10) PARTITION BY RANGE(id); +CREATE FOREIGN TABLE sch6.part2 PARTITION OF sch5.part1 FOR VALUES FROM (0) TO (5) SERVER fdw_server; +CREATE PUBLICATION pub4 FOR TABLES IN SCHEMA sch5 WITH (publish_via_partition_root); +SELECT pubname, tablename FROM pg_publication_tables WHERE pubname = 'pub4' ORDER BY pubname, tablename; +  DROP PUBLICATION pub1;  DROP PUBLICATION pub2;  DROP PUBLICATION pub3;

I think this is a wrong assumption:

ScanKeyInit(&key[keycount++], Anum_pg_class_relispartition, BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_BOOLEQ, BoolGetDatum(false));

In this case sch5.part1 is partitioned table, but it also partition of table in different schema p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }

-- 
With best regards,
Sergey Tatarintsev, 
PostgresPro

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PGSERVICEFILE as part of a normal connection string
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix build on MINGW on ARM64