Re: Rework of collation code, extensibility - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: Rework of collation code, extensibility
Date
Msg-id c394d313bec551ec968699bc2a248e843ebba785.camel@j-davis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rework of collation code, extensibility  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Rework of collation code, extensibility
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2023-01-31 at 11:40 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I don't know to what extent this depends on the abbreviated key GUC
> discussion.  Does the rest of this patch set depend on this?

The overall refactoring is not dependent logically on the GUC patch. It
may require some trivial fixup if you eliminate the GUC patch.

I left it there because it makes exploring/testing easier (at least for
me), but the GUC patch doesn't need to be committed if there's no
consensus.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: recovery modules
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: MacOS: xsltproc fails with "warning: failed to load external entity"