On 6/4/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Perhaps a reasonable compromise could work like this: at the first point
> in a transaction where a temp file is created, choose a random list
> element, and thereafter advance cyclically for the duration of that
> transaction. This ensures within-transaction spread-out while still
> having some randomness across backends.
>
> The reason I'm thinking per-transaction is that we could tie this to
> setting up a cached list of tablespace OIDs, which would avoid the
> overhead of repeat parsing and tablespace validity checking. We had
> rejected using a long-lived cache because of the problem of tablespaces
> getting dropped, but I think one that lasts only across a transaction
> would be OK.
>
> And the reason I'm thinking a cache is important is that if you really
> want to get any win from this idea, you need to spread the temp files
> across tablespaces *per file*, which is not the way it works now.
ok. are you doing this? or can i prepare a patch that implements this?
i guess we can allocate the memory for the list in TopTransactionContext.
--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs and the universe trying
to produce bigger and better idiots.
So far, the universe is winning." Richard Cook
