On 7/10/24 06:44, Guyren Howe wrote:
> On Jul 9, 2024, at 17:58, Krishnakant Mane <kkproghub@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I have a straight forward question, but I am just trying to analyze the specifics.
>>
>> So I have a set of queries depending on each other in a sequence to compute some results for generating financial
report.
>>
>> It involves summing up some amounts from tuns or of rows and also on certain conditions it categorizes the amounts
intotypes (aka Debit Balance, Credit balance etc).
>>
>> There are at least 6 queries in this sequence and apart from 4 input parameters. these queries never change.
>>
>> So will I get any performance benefit by having them in a stored procedure rather than sending the queries from my
Pythonbased API?
> Almost certainly.
>
> Doing it all in a stored procedure or likely even better a single query will remove all of the latency involved in
goingback and forth between your app and the database.
>
> Insofar as the queries you are running separately access similar data, a single query will be able to do that work
once.
>
> There are other potential benefits (a smaller number of queries reduces planning time, for example).
Basically there are if else conditions and it's not just the queries but
the conditional sequence in which they execute.
So one single query won't do the job.
But Thank you for confirming my understanding.
I believe that the fact that stored procedures are compiled also makes
them perform faster, is that correct?
Regards.
