Re: Potential ABI breakage in upcoming minor releases - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Potential ABI breakage in upcoming minor releases
Date
Msg-id c02230d4-47ea-46dd-94cc-545c3c874c7b@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Potential ABI breakage in upcoming minor releases  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: Potential ABI breakage in upcoming minor releases
Re: Potential ABI breakage in upcoming minor releases
List pgsql-hackers
On 29.11.24 21:39, Noah Misch wrote:
>> I remembered where that's documented:
>>
>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/ 
>> Committing_checklist#Maintaining_ABI_compatibility_while_backpatching
> I'd say the source tree's <sect2 id="xfunc-api-abi-stability-guidance">, which
> David Wheeler mentioned, is authoritative.  It currently matches
> postgr.es/c/e54a42a.  Let's update both or change that wiki heading to point
> to the authoritative doc section.

I don't know if this proposing to merge the text in the wiki into the docs?

The text in the docs is describing to extension authors what they can 
expect.  The text in the wiki is advice for server developers how to 
attempt to satisfy those expectations.  So I think those can be separate 
pieces of text.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Role Sandboxing for Secure Impersonation
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos