Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
Date
Msg-id c007f3c9a5f2866aa2c0b90680eb22cf9f5b58c3.camel@j-davis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
Responses Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2023-04-17 at 08:23 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > I don't object to this patch.  I suggest waiting until next week to
> > commit
> > it and then see what happens.  It's easy to revert if it goes
> > terribly.
>
> Is this still being considered for v16 ?

Yes, unless someone raises a procedural objection.

Is now a reasonable time to check it in and see what breaks? It looks
like there are quite a few buildfarm members that specify neither --
with-icu nor --without-icu.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: v16dev: TRAP: failed Assert("size > SizeOfXLogRecord"), File: "xlog.c", Line: 1055, PID: 13564
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: v16dev: TRAP: failed Assert("size > SizeOfXLogRecord"), File: "xlog.c", Line: 1055, PID: 13564