Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
Date
Msg-id 2497753.1681756418@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
List pgsql-hackers
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> Is now a reasonable time to check it in and see what breaks? It looks
> like there are quite a few buildfarm members that specify neither --
> with-icu nor --without-icu.

I see you just pinged buildfarm-members again, so I'd think it's
polite to give people 24 hours or so to deal with that before
you break things.

(My animals are all set, I believe.)

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: v16dev: TRAP: failed Assert("size > SizeOfXLogRecord"), File: "xlog.c", Line: 1055, PID: 13564
Next
From: Miroslav Bendik
Date:
Subject: Re: Incremental sort for access method with ordered scan support (amcanorderbyop)