Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Justin Pryzby
Subject Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
Date
Msg-id ZD1INw6en0EUInYH@telsasoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 09:33:25AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 16.03.23 14:52, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 09.03.23 20:14, Jeff Davis wrote:
> > > > Let's come back to that after dealing with the other two.
> > > 
> > > Leaving 0001 open for now.
> > 
> > I suspect making a change like this now would result in a bloodbath on
> > the build farm that we could do without.  I suggest revisiting this
> > after the commit fest ends.
> 
> I don't object to this patch.  I suggest waiting until next week to commit
> it and then see what happens.  It's easy to revert if it goes terribly.

Is this still being considered for v16 ?

-- 
Justin



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: longfin missing gssapi_ext.h
Next
From: Richard Guo
Date:
Subject: Re: Incremental sort for access method with ordered scan support (amcanorderbyop)