Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
Date
Msg-id 82c4c816-06f6-d3e3-ba02-fca4a5cef065@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
List pgsql-hackers
On 16.03.23 14:52, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 09.03.23 20:14, Jeff Davis wrote:
>>> Let's come back to that after dealing with the other two.
>>
>> Leaving 0001 open for now.
> 
> I suspect making a change like this now would result in a bloodbath on 
> the build farm that we could do without.  I suggest revisiting this 
> after the commit fest ends.

I don't object to this patch.  I suggest waiting until next week to 
commit it and then see what happens.  It's easy to revert if it goes 
terribly.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure
Next
From: Pavel Luzanov
Date:
Subject: Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command