On Fri, 2025-03-07 at 12:41 -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> Ugh... this feels like a bit of the combinatorial explosion,
> especially if we ever need to add another option.
Not quite that bad, because ideally the yes/no/only would not be
expanding as well. But I agree that it feels like a lot of options.
> I wonder if it would
> be possible to do something simple like just providing
> "--include={schema|data|stats}" where you specify only what you want,
> and leave out what you don't.
Can you explain the idea in a bit more detail? Does --
include=statistics mean include statistics also or statistics only? Can
you explicitly request that data be included but rely on the default
for statistics? What options would it override or conflict with?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
