Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

[GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Thomas Güttler
Subject [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?
Date
Msg-id beaf38ba-294b-fa6b-3250-4ade59180c66@thomas-guettler.de
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?  (Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>)
Re: [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?  (Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>)
Re: [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Re: [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?  (Thomas Delrue <thomas@epistulae.net>)
List pgsql-general
Tree view 
Is is possible that PostgreSQL will replace these building blocks in the future?

 - redis (Caching)
 - rabbitmq (amqp)
 - s3 (Blob storage)

One question is "is it possible?", then next "is it feasible?"

I think it would be great if I could use PG only and if I could
avoid the other types of servers.

The benefit is not very obvious on the first sight. I think it will saves you
time, money and energy only in the long run.

What do you think?

Regards,
  Thomas Güttler


--
I am looking for feedback for my personal programming guidelines:
https://github.com/guettli/programming-guidelines

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] query planner placement of sort/limit w.r.t. joins
Next
From: Thomas Delrue
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?