Thank you for working on this issue. Your comments helped me make this
patch more correct.
> Lines with "colon" format shouldn't use equal signs, and should use two
> spaces
> between fields.
Done. Now extra line looks like "Loop min_rows: %.0f max_rows: %.0f
total_rows: %.0f" or "Loop min_time: %.3f max_time: %.3f min_rows:
%.0f max_rows: %.0f total_rows: %.0f".
> Since this is now on a separate line, the "if (nloops > 1 &&
> es->verbose)"
> can be after the existing "if (es->timing)", and shouldn't need its own
> "if (es->timing)". It should conditionally add a separate line, rather
> than
> duplicating the "(actual.*" line.
>
>> - if (es->timing)
>> + if (nloops > 1 && es->verbose)
New version of patch contains this correction. It helped make the patch
shorter.
> In non-text mode, think you should not check "nloops > 1". Rather,
> print the
> field as 0.
The fields will not be zeros. New line will almost repeat the line with
main sttistics.
> I think the labels in non-text format should say "Loop Min Time" or
> similar.
>
> And these variables should have a loop_ prefix like loop_min_t ?
There are good ideas. I changed it.
I apply new version of this patch. I hope it got better.
Please don't hesitate to share any thoughts on this topic.
--
Ekaterina Sokolova
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
